Donaldson v. State

265 S.W.3d 358, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2008 WL 4402871
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. ED 90475·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John Donaldson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request that the plea court have him screened for long-term drug treatment.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donaldson v. State, 265 S.W.3d 358, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2008 WL 4402871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

265 S.W.3d 358 (Donaldson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhone v. State
265 S.W.3d 358 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)