Donaldson v. State

265 S.W.3d 358, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2008 WL 4402871
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 30, 2008
DocketED 90475
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 S.W.3d 358 (Donaldson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donaldson v. State, 265 S.W.3d 358, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2008 WL 4402871 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, John Donaldson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request that the plea court have him screened for long-term drug treatment.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhone v. State
265 S.W.3d 358 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 S.W.3d 358, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337, 2008 WL 4402871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donaldson-v-state-moctapp-2008.