Donaldson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Donaldson v. State

309 So. 2d 592, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14429

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Donaldson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15480 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1975·No. No. 74-1083·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of this appeal by the defendant below from a judgment of conviction of the crime of carrying a concealed firearm, in violation of § 790.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., we hold no reversible error has been shown. The motion to suppress the evidence consisting of the gun was properly denied. In the circumstances disclosed the search of the defendant and seizure of the weapon were properly made, under § 901.151(2) and (5) Fla.Stat., F.S. A. The court correctly sustained the state’s objection to the defendant’s attorney’s attempt to make negative use of the police report to impeach a police officer witness. State v. Johnson, Fla.1973, 284 So.2d 198.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of this appeal by the defendant below from a judgment of conviction of the crime of carrying a concealed firearm, in violation of § 790.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., we hold no reversible error has been shown. The motion to suppress the evidence consisting of the gun was properly denied. In the circumstances disclosed the search of the defendant and seizure of the weapon were properly made, under § 901.151(2) and (5) Fla.Stat., F.S. A. The court correctly sustained the state’s objection to the defendant’s attorney’s attempt to make negative use of the police report to impeach a police officer witness. State v. Johnson, Fla.1973, 284 So.2d 198.

Affirmed.

Donaldson v. State, 309 So. 2d 592, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14429 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

309 So. 2d 592 (Donaldson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related