Donaldson v. Merit Systems Protection Board

624 F. App'x 108
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2015·No. No. 15-1694·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

• Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Donnell Donaldson seeks review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s order dismissing his whistleblower retaliation appeal. See 5 U.S.C.A. § 7703(b)(1)(B) (West Supp.2015). Our review of the record discloses that the Board did not err in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over Donaldson’s appeal. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Donaldson v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., No. DC-1221-12-0356-B-1, 2014 WL 5424010 (M.S.P.B. Sept. 16, 2014). We further deny Donaldson’s motions for summary disposition, to strike the Board’s entire brief, and to verify the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donaldson v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 624 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2015).

624 F. App'x 108 (Donaldson v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related