Donaldson v. Jackson

9 Wend. 450
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1832·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff objected preliminarily to a motion made by the defendant, that short notice had been given, and asked costs for appearing to oppose. It was said in opposition, that if the plaintiff insisted on his objection, he was not entitled to costs, because, knowing the notice to be defective, he was not bound to appear. But by The Court, he might think it prudent to appear, lest by inadvertence the defect in the notice might not be observed, and the motion pass against him ; and having appeared, he is entitled to costs.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donaldson v. Jackson, 9 Wend. 450 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

9 Wend. 450 (Donaldson v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballou v. Smith
31 N.H. 413 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1855)
Ayres v. Covill
9 How. Pr. 573 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
In re Anon.
18 Wend. 304 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)