Donaldson v. Chance

87 S.E. 395, 144 Ga. 469, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 639
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 17, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 395 (Donaldson v. Chance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donaldson v. Chance, 87 S.E. 395, 144 Ga. 469, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 639 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. To make an objection to evidence available in the reviewing court, it must appear that objection was made and upon what grounds it was made in the trial court.

2. Under the evidence contained in the record, there was no error in dismissing the certiorari, thereby affirming the judgment of the ordinary in the habeas-corpus proceedings.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holiday Homes, Inc. v. Bragg
208 S.E.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Smith v. Rich's, Inc.
190 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Cotherman v. Cotherman
128 S.E.2d 728 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Maxwell v. Hollis
104 S.E.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Edenfield v. Brinson
100 S.E. 373 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 395, 144 Ga. 469, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donaldson-v-chance-ga-1915.