Donaldson v. Chance

87 S.E. 395, 144 Ga. 469, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 639
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 17, 1915·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. To make an objection to evidence available in the reviewing court, it must appear that objection was made and upon what grounds it was made in the trial court.

2. Under the evidence contained in the record, there was no error in dismissing the certiorari, thereby affirming the judgment of the ordinary in the habeas-corpus proceedings.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donaldson v. Chance, 87 S.E. 395, 144 Ga. 469, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 639 (Ga. 1915).

87 S.E. 395 (Donaldson v. Chance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holiday Homes, Inc. v. Bragg
208 S.E.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Smith v. Rich's, Inc.
190 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Cotherman v. Cotherman
128 S.E.2d 728 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Maxwell v. Hollis
104 S.E.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Edenfield v. Brinson
100 S.E. 373 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)