Donaldson v. Benton
20 N.C. 435
Opinion
It cannot be contended that Bank notes are a lawful tender, and it is equally plain that parol evidence is not admissible to contradict the written agreement. The opinion of the Judge is so obviously right upon both these points — each of which is fatal to the plaintiff’s recovery— that it necessarily follows that the judgment must be affirmed with costs.
Per Curiam,. ■ Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donaldson v. Benton, 20 N.C. 435 (N.C. 1839).
20 N.C. 435 (Donaldson v. Benton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. . McMillan
4 N.C. 244 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1815)
Hawkins v. . Hawkins
4 N.C. 107 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1814)