Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance

655 N.E.2d 395, 85 N.Y.2d 1021, 631 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 2209
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 655 N.E.2d 395 (Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance, 655 N.E.2d 395, 85 N.Y.2d 1021, 631 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 2209 (N.Y. 1995).

Opinion

[1022]*1022Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that portion of Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaints, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 N.E.2d 395, 85 N.Y.2d 1021, 631 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 2209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donaldson-lufkin-jenrette-inc-v-vigilant-insurance-ny-1995.