Donalds, Ltd. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Donalds, Ltd. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 253

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Donalds, Ltd. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 310 →

United States Customs Court·Decided January 4, 1955·No. No. 58660; protests 178493-K, 178494-K, and 178495-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the holders of the vapex inhalers are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Donalds Ltd., Inc. v. United States (32 Cust. Ct. 310, C. D. 1619), it was held that the holders are not subject to the additional duties under section 504, and that said holders, together with their containers, are properly dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the holders of the vapex inhalers are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Donalds Ltd., Inc. v. United States (32 Cust. Ct. 310, C. D. 1619), it was held that the holders are not subject to the additional duties under section 504, and that said holders, together with their containers, are properly dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 5.

Donalds, Ltd. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 253 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 253 (Donalds, Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related