Donald Young and Doris Young v. Dwayne R. Day, P.C. and Dwayne R. Day

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 8, 2016·No. 01-16-00325-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-16-00325-CV Style: Donald Young and Doris Young v. Dwayne R. Day, P.C. and Dwayne R. Day Date motion filed*: August 26, 2016 Type of motion: Opposed Motion to Strike Supplemental Clerk’s Record or, in the Alternative, to Strike All Pleadings in the Supplemental Clerk’s Record Which Are Not Required Pursuant to TRAP 34.5(a) as Untimely Party filing motion: Appellants Document to be filed:

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1) (providing for supplementation of clerk’s record); Roventini v. Ocular Servs., Inc., 111 S.W.3d 719, 725–26 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1), (3).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 8, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Young and Doris Young v. Dwayne R. Day, P.C. and Dwayne R. Day, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Donald Young and Doris Young v. Dwayne R. Day, P.C. and Dwayne R. Day (Donald Young and Doris Young v. Dwayne R. Day, P.C. and Dwayne R. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roventini v. Ocular Sciences, Inc.
111 S.W.3d 719 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)