Donald Wray Spears v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Donald Wray Spears v. United States

370 F.2d 335

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1967

Docket20754_1

StatusPublished

This text of 370 F.2d 335 (Donald Wray Spears v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donald Wray Spears v. United States, 370 F.2d 335 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This border crossing narcotics ease is affirmed on the authority of Blackford v. United States, 9 Cir., 247 F.2d 745, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586.

The rectal probing and the circumstances thereof are quite similar to Blackford. It should be noted that the facts here are much stronger for the government than our recent case of Rivas v. United States, 9 Cir., 368 F.2d 703, decided November 8, 1966.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This border crossing narcotics ease is affirmed on the authority of Blackford v. United States, 9 Cir., 247 F.2d 745, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586.

The rectal probing and the circumstances thereof are quite similar to Blackford. It should be noted that the facts here are much stronger for the government than our recent case of Rivas v. United States, 9 Cir., 368 F.2d 703, decided November 8, 1966.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 F.2d 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-wray-spears-v-united-states-ca9-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack