Donald Wilcox and Prairie Dog Investments, LLC v. Rebecca Staples and Cliff Staples
This text of Donald Wilcox and Prairie Dog Investments, LLC v. Rebecca Staples and Cliff Staples (Donald Wilcox and Prairie Dog Investments, LLC v. Rebecca Staples and Cliff Staples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-16-00027-CV
DONALD WILCOX AND PRAIRIE DOG INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant
V.
REBECCA STAPLES AND CLIFF STAPLES, Appellee
On Appeal from the 7th District Court Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. 14-1132-A
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER
On April 15, 2016, Appellants Donald Wilcox and Prairie Dog Investments, LLC
(collectively Appellants or PDI), filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying
their motion to dismiss and/or dissolve a receivership and to stay all further trial court proceedings
pending resolution of the appeal. In connection with that interlocutory appeal, 1 Wilcox and PDI
filed a motion for an emergency stay. The stay motion requests that this Court stay any and all
underlying proceedings by the trial court or by the court-appointed receiver pending this Court’s
ruling on the interlocutory appeal or the successful resolution of this appeal at mediation, currently
scheduled for May 10, 2016.
After reviewing the emergency stay motion, this Court is of the opinion that the relief
requested in the motion should be granted, in part. Pursuant to Rule 29.3 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure, (1) all proceedings and activities in trial court cause number 14-1132-A and
(2) all actions by the court-appointed receiver in and related to trial court cause number 14-1132-
A, other than any actions needed to protect the property in the receiver’s possession, are
temporarily stayed effective immediately and continuing for a period of two weeks from the date
of this order, up to and including May 2, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3.
This temporary stay is expressly contingent on Appellants posting a $7,500.00 cash or
corporate bond in the trial court on or before 5:00 p.m., April 19, 2016. No action shall be taken
1 Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals in Tyler, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2 by either the trial court or the court-appointed receiver between the time this order issues and 5:00
p.m., April 19, 2016. If Appellants fail to post such bond on or before 5:00 p.m., April 19, 2016,
the stay contemplated by this order shall become null and void. In the event that an appropriate
cash or corporate bond is timely posted by Appellants, the stay contemplated by this order shall
continue in full force and effect up to and including May 2, 2016, or until such time as this Court
issues an order specifically lifting the stay.
Assuming Appellants satisfy the bond requirement, the Court requests that Appellees
Rebecca Staples and Cliff Staples submit a response to Appellants motion for an emergency stay
to be received by this Court on or before April 28, 2016. After the Court has reviewed the
complete appellate record and Appellees’ response, if any, to the emergency stay motion, it shall
determine whether to continue the temporary stay beyond May 2, 2016, or to dissolve the stay.
Now, therefore, it is ordered that all proceedings and activities in the trial court, including,
but not limited to, any proceedings on the receiver’s “Second Motion for Approval of Disbursal
of Funds,” currently set for hearing on April 18, 2016, in cause number 14-1132-A in the 7th
Judicial District Court of Smith County, Texas, shall be stayed, together with all actions of the
receiver, other than any actions needed to protect the property in the receiver’s possession, in
accordance with the terms and conditions detailed above for a period of two weeks, up to and
including May 2, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: April 18, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald Wilcox and Prairie Dog Investments, LLC v. Rebecca Staples and Cliff Staples, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-wilcox-and-prairie-dog-investments-llc-v-rebecca-staples-and-cliff-texapp-2016.