Donald W. Taylor v. Clark Aspy, Madison Preston and Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLL

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 5, 2022
Docket04-21-00387-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Donald W. Taylor v. Clark Aspy, Madison Preston and Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLL (Donald W. Taylor v. Clark Aspy, Madison Preston and Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald W. Taylor v. Clark Aspy, Madison Preston and Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLL, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 5, 2022

No. 04-21-00387-CV

Donald W. TAYLOR, Appellant

v.

Clark ASPY, Madison Preston and Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLL, Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas Trial Court No. 16670 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On May 2, 2022, this court received appellant’s brief. The brief violates the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in that it: 1. does not contain an index of authorities with appropriate citations to page numbers, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(c); 2. does not contain a clear and concise argument with citations to legal authority, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i); 3. does not contain an appendix including the necessary contents required by the Rules, see TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(k). We recognize appellant is acting pro se on appeal. But “a pro se litigant is held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with applicable laws and rules of procedure.” Strange v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 126 S.W.3d 676, 677 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, pet. denied). We therefore ORDER that the brief filed by the appellant is STRICKEN from our record. It is FURTHER ORDERED that appellant file an amended brief in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no later than May 25, 2022 or this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9, 42.3. _________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of May, 2022.

___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strange v. Continental Casualty Co.
126 S.W.3d 676 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Donald W. Taylor v. Clark Aspy, Madison Preston and Naman Howell Smith & Lee, PLL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-w-taylor-v-clark-aspy-madison-preston-and-naman-howell-smith-texapp-2022.