Donald v. State

114 So. 3d 989, 2012 WL 2359752, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10106
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2012·No. No. 5D11-1391·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points on appeal. We affirm as to the first point without further discussion. As to the second point, we affirm based on Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition of Adkins.

AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald v. State, 114 So. 3d 989, 2012 WL 2359752, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10106 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

114 So. 3d 989 (Donald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Adkins
71 So. 3d 117 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)