Donald v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Donald v. State

953 So. 2d 676, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4660, 2007 WL 935491

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2007·No. No. 1D07-0555·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order issued on February 8, 2007, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely. The appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the order on appeal. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a petition for belated appeal pursuant to rule 9.141(c).

BROWNING, C.J., KAHN, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order issued on February 8, 2007, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely. The appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the order on appeal. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a petition for belated appeal pursuant to rule 9.141(c).

BROWNING, C.J., KAHN, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Donald v. State, 953 So. 2d 676, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4660, 2007 WL 935491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

953 So. 2d 676 (Donald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.