Donald v. Loft, Inc.

243 A.D. 607

This text of 243 A.D. 607 (Donald v. Loft, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald v. Loft, Inc., 243 A.D. 607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

On argument, resettled order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew a prior motion for examination before trial and on such renewal to direct that the examination be held as to the superintendent of plants and the president of defendants Loft, Inc., and Mavis, Inc., reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Appeal from original order dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-loft-inc-nyappdiv-1935.