Donald v. Lee
This text of Donald v. Lee (Donald v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4 * * *
5 Keith Donald, Case No. 2:25-cv-00016-APG-BNW
6 Plaintiff, ORDER 7 v.
8 Chris Lee, et al.,
9 Defendants.
10 11 Plaintiff—who is currently incarcerated—submitted an application to proceed in forma 12 pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 1. 13 Under the Local Rules, an incarcerated plaintiff seeking to proceed without paying the 14 filing fee must complete an application to proceed IFP and attach “a certificate from the 15 institution certifying the amount of funds currently held in the applicant’s trust account at the 16 institution and the net deposits in the applicant’s account for the six months before the date of 17 submission of the application.” LSR 1-2; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (requiring an 18 incarcerated plaintiff seeking IFP status to submit “a certified copy of the trust fund account 19 statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately 20 preceding the filing of the complaint . . ., obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at 21 which the prisoner is or was confined.”). If the plaintiff has been incarcerated at the institution for 22 fewer than six months, the certificate must show the account’s activity for the shortened period. 23 LSR 1-2. 24 Here, plaintiff’s IFP application is incomplete because it lacks a financial certificate from 25 the institution where plaintiff is detained showing the amount of funds currently in plaintiff’s trust 26 account and the net deposits in the account for the six-months preceding plaintiff’s application. 27 Accordingly, the Court lacks the information necessary to resolve plaintiff’s request to proceed 1 Additionally, Plaintiff did not submit a complaint with his IFP application. Instead, he 2 submitted a letter. However, for this Court to proceed with his case, he must submit a complaint. 3 To help Plaintiff file a properly formatted complaint, the Court now advises Plaintiff of 4 the following requirements under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is also advised 5 that failure to comply with these rules when drafting and filing his amended complaint may result 6 in this action being dismissed. 7 First, Plaintiff is advised that he must specify which claims he is alleging against which 8 defendants. Although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure adopt a flexible pleading policy, 9 Plaintiff still must give defendants fair notice of each of the claims he is alleging against each 10 defendant. Specifically, he must allege facts showing how each named defendant is involved and 11 the approximate dates of their involvement. Put another way, Plaintiff should tell the Court, in 12 plain language, what each defendant did to him and when. “While legal conclusions can provide 13 the framework of a complaint, they must be supported with factual allegations.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 14 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009). 15 Second, Plaintiff’s amended complaint must be short and plain. The simpler and more 16 concise Plaintiff’s complaint, the easier it is for the Court to understand and screen it. The Federal 17 Rules also require this. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, Plaintiff’s amended complaint 18 must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that [Plaintiff] is entitled to 19 relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). “Each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct.” Fed. R. 20 Civ. P. 8(d)(1). “A party must state its claims or defenses in numbered paragraphs, each limited 21 as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). “[E]ach claim 22 founded on a separate transaction or occurrence . . . must be stated in a separate count.” Id. 23 Lastly, his complaint must be legible. 24 *** 25 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma 26 Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED without prejudice. 27 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must send plaintiff a blank 2 || application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate as well as the accompanying instruction 3 || packet. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court send to Plaintiff the approved form 5 || for filing a § 1983 complaint and instructions for the same. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by February 28, 2025, plaintiff must either: (1) file a 7 || complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form with complete financial 8 || attachments, or (2) pay the full $405 fee for filing a civil action, which includes the $350 filing 9 || fee and the $55 administrative fee. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by February 28, 2025, plaintiff must file a complaint. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to timely comply with this order may result in 12 || arecommendation to the district judge that this case be dismissed. See LR IA 11-8. 13 14 DATED: January 7, 2025. 15 16 _ Fg la ve □□□ BRENDA WEKSLER □ 17 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-lee-nvd-2025.