Donald v. District of Columbia
108 F.2d 15, 71 App. D.C. 156, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2491
This text of 108 F.2d 15 (Donald v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Donald v. District of Columbia, 108 F.2d 15, 71 App. D.C. 156, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2491 (D.C. Cir. 1939).
Opinion
Appellants were convicted in the District Police Court for selling intoxicating liquors without having obtained a license to do so. We have carefully examined both the testimony and the instructions to the jury and find no merit in the various assignments of error. Appellants received a fair trial, and their conviction must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 F.2d 15, 71 App. D.C. 156, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1939.