Donald v. Cotton States Tire & Rubber Co.

89 So. 296, 206 Ala. 88, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 19, 1921
Docket6 Div. 415.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 So. 296 (Donald v. Cotton States Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald v. Cotton States Tire & Rubber Co., 89 So. 296, 206 Ala. 88, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 46 (Ala. 1921).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The petition was for writ of prohibition against plaintiff Cotton States Tire & Rubber Company, Thomas Lea, as judge of the municipal court of Birmingham, and J. E. Matlock, as constable of precinct 12 in Jefferson county.

The judgment sustaining demurrer to the petition was rendered on November 13, 1920, and the appeal taken and perfected on March 25, 1921 — more than 30 days after the final judgment was rendered. Code, § 4866; Wells Amusement Co. v. Eros, 204 Ala. 239, 85 South. 692; Shackleford v. State, 204 Ala. 362, 85 South. 786; City of Birmingham v. Sou. Bell Tel. Co., 203 Ala. 251, 82 South. 519. The statute is mandatory. Lusk v. Capehart, 129 Ala. 599, 30 South. 31; State ex rel. Crow v. Crook, Judge, 123 Ala. 657, 27 South. 334; Ireland v. Brown, 6 Ala. App. 235, 60 South. 559. The court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal, nothing being presented for review. It follows that the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dearborn Stove Company v. Dean
115 So. 2d 253 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 So. 296, 206 Ala. 88, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-cotton-states-tire-rubber-co-ala-1921.