Donald Steven Toth v. Ronald C. Marshall

803 F.2d 722, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31345, 1986 WL 17796
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 26, 1986
Docket86-3597
StatusUnpublished

This text of 803 F.2d 722 (Donald Steven Toth v. Ronald C. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Steven Toth v. Ronald C. Marshall, 803 F.2d 722, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31345, 1986 WL 17796 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

803 F.2d 722

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
DONALD STEVEN TOTH, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
RONALD C. MARSHALL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-3597.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 26, 1986.

BEFORE: KEITH, MERRITT and NORRIS, Circuit Judges

ORDER

On July 11, 1986, this Court entered an order directing the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has failed to respond.

It appears from the record that the judgment was entered May 9, 1986. The notice of appeal filed on June 12, 1986, was three days late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1983). Rule 26(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 F.2d 722, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31345, 1986 WL 17796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-steven-toth-v-ronald-c-marshall-ca6-1986.