Donald Sneed v. Maurice Landrieu and Clarence B. Giarrusso

468 F.2d 626
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 1972
Docket71-3219
StatusPublished

This text of 468 F.2d 626 (Donald Sneed v. Maurice Landrieu and Clarence B. Giarrusso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Sneed v. Maurice Landrieu and Clarence B. Giarrusso, 468 F.2d 626 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an attempt to appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing some but not all of the parties defendant. Appellant’s attorney has now agreed that the order appealed from is not a “final judgment” under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 and that neither 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b) nor Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., justifies our presently reviewing the dismissal order. See Wright, Federal Courts §§ 101, 102 (2d ed. 1970). An appeal of the dismissal order must thus await the entry of a final judgment in the district court, and this appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F.2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-sneed-v-maurice-landrieu-and-clarence-b-giarrusso-ca5-1972.