Donald Ray McCray v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
This text of Donald Ray McCray v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division (Donald Ray McCray v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-18-00257-CR
DONALD RAY MCCRAY, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 251st District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 70,652-C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding
July 27, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.
Appellant Donald Ray McCray, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a
purported judgment.1 However, no pronouncement of sentence or appealable order has
been entered by the trial court. Questioning whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal,
we directed appellant to address the matter. In response, appellant has requested a 45-
day extension to “file notice pursuant to the outline of Rule 38.1 of the Appellate
1Appellant has previously filed five notices of appeal in this criminal case: cause numbers 07-16- 00020-CR, 07-16-00444-CR, 07-17-00058-CR, 07-17-00258-CR, and 07-18-00011-CR. We dismissed the appeals for want of jurisdiction. Procedure.” Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure pertains to the filing of
an appellate brief, specifying the issues for substantive review by this court. If we have
no jurisdiction over the appeal, we cannot review issues raised in such a brief. Because
appellant’s need for an extension is baseless, we deny his request.
As we stated in Kerr v. State, No. 07-13-00128-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12850,
at *9 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Nov. 25, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
publication), “[w]hen no sentence is pronounced, there is no valid judgment or conviction
from which to appeal.” Given the absence of either an oral pronouncement of sentence
or an appealable order, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, we dismiss
the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald Ray McCray v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-ray-mccray-v-texas-department-of-criminal-justice-institutional-texapp-2018.