Donald Ray Gipson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 05-15-01227-CR·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 22, 2015.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01227-CR

DONALD RAY GIPSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-55009-X

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Fillmore and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Donald Ray Gipson filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s August 21, 2015

hearing on appellant’s “admonish and dismissal of counsel.” We have received written

confirmation from the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office that there is no judgment in this

case. We conclude we have no jurisdiction over the appeal.

“Jurisdiction concerns the power of a court to hear and determine a case.” Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The jurisdiction of an appellate court must be

legally invoked, and, if not, the power of the court to act is as absent as if it did not exist. See id.

at 523. “The standard to determine whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to hear and

determine a case ‘is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is

authorized by law.’” Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (quoting Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)). The right to appeal in a

criminal case is a statutorily created right. See McKinney v. State, 207 S.W.3d 366, 374 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2006); Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 646 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). See also TEX.

CODE CRIM. P. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006) (providing right of appeal for defendant); TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (rules for appeal by defendant). Appellate courts may consider appeals by

criminal defendants only after conviction or the entry of an appealable order. See Wright v.

State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1998, no pet.).

Appellant is not appealing his conviction, and an interlocutory order related to the

appointment of new counsel is not an appealable order. See id. Accordingly, we have no

jurisdiction over the appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 151227F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DONALD RAY GIPSON, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-01227-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-55009-X. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart, Chief THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justice Wright and Justice Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of October, 2015.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Ray Gipson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Donald Ray Gipson v. State (Donald Ray Gipson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffin v. State
145 S.W.3d 645 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Wright v. State
969 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
McKinney v. State
207 S.W.3d 366 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Blanton, Donald Gene
369 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)