Donald R. Brant v. Edwin B. Tetlow

First Circuit

Donald R. Brant v. Edwin B. Tetlow

328 F.2d 890, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6099

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1964

Docket6255_1

StatusPublished

This text of 328 F.2d 890 (Donald R. Brant v. Edwin B. Tetlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donald R. Brant v. Edwin B. Tetlow, 328 F.2d 890, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6099 (1st Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the denial of a petition for mandamus is dismissed, following hearing, for failure to present a substantial question. We know of no principle that would compel a'district court to order a United States Commissioner to issue a criminal warrant upon an unsigned and unsworn-to complaint merely because counsel for the complainant offers to testify to its truth. No other issues need be considered.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the denial of a petition for mandamus is dismissed, following hearing, for failure to present a substantial question. We know of no principle that would compel a'district court to order a United States Commissioner to issue a criminal warrant upon an unsigned and unsworn-to complaint merely because counsel for the complainant offers to testify to its truth. No other issues need be considered.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

328 F.2d 890, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-r-brant-v-edwin-b-tetlow-ca1-1964.