Donald Muir, Sr. v. Metro Auto Sales, Inc.
This text of Donald Muir, Sr. v. Metro Auto Sales, Inc. (Donald Muir, Sr. v. Metro Auto Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1969 Doc: 32 Filed: 07/31/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1969
DONALD MUIR, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
SAED QATAWNEH; AMIR MASHAQBEH, d/b/a Jordan Towing, Inc.,
Defendants – Appellants,
v.
METRO AUTO SALES, INC.,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallager, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01794-SAG)
Submitted: March 21, 2024 Decided: July 31, 2024
Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Paul M. Finamore, Halle P. Gray, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Columbia, Maryland; Paul D. Bekman, Aryeh M. Rabinowitz, BEKMAN, MARDER, HOPPER, MALARKEY & PERLIN, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Margaret Fonshell USCA4 Appeal: 23-1969 Doc: 32 Filed: 07/31/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
Ward, Megan G. Freeman, DOWNS WARD BENDER HERZOG & KINTIGH, P.A., Hunt Valley, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 23-1969 Doc: 32 Filed: 07/31/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
In this negligence action, Plaintiff Donald Muir, Sr., Defendant Saed Qatawneh, and
Defendant Amir Mashaqbeh appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor
of Defendant Metro Auto Sales, Inc. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo,
viewing the facts and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving
party. See Pledger v. Lynch, 5 F.4th 511, 524 (4th Cir. 2021).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We conclude that Muir
offered insufficient evidence of control for a jury to find that a master-servant relationship
existed between Metro Auto Sales, Inc., and Saed Qatawneh at the time of Muir’s accident.
See Green v. H&R Block, Inc., 735 A.2d 1039, 1048 (Md. 1999); Brady v. Ralph Parsons
Co., 520 A.2d 717, 730 n.26 (Md. 1987) (“A person who contracts . . . to deliver something
to another, but who is not acting as a fiduciary for the other, is a non-agent independent
contractor.” (cleaned up)); Whitehead v. Safway Steel Prods., Inc., 497 A.2d 803, 809 (Md.
1985) (holding that the “decisive” or “controlling” factor in a master-servant relationship
is “whether the [principal] has the right to control and direct the [agent] in the performance
of the work and in the manner in which the work is to be done” (cleaned up)).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of
Defendant Metro Auto Sales, Inc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald Muir, Sr. v. Metro Auto Sales, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-muir-sr-v-metro-auto-sales-inc-ca4-2024.