Donald Marlin Dill v. Admiral James Watkins and Joe La Grone
This text of 951 F.2d 348 (Donald Marlin Dill v. Admiral James Watkins and Joe La Grone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Donald Marlin DILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Admiral James WATKINS; and Joe La Grone, Defendant-Appellees.
No. 91-5039.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 30, 1991.
Before KEITH and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
Donald Marlin Dill appeals from the district court's September 10, 1990, order dismissing his claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Having carefully considered the record and the arguments presented in the briefs and orally, we find no error warranting reversal. We, therefore, AFFIRM the order of the Honorable Thomas G. Hull, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, for the reasons set forth in his September 10, 1990, Order.
The Honorable Ann Aldrich, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
951 F.2d 348, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 32053, 1991 WL 278957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-marlin-dill-v-admiral-james-watkins-and-joe-la-grone-ca6-1991.