Donald MacFarlane and James Fogle v. Kay Walter and Kenneth Ducharme

216 F.3d 881, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5537, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7354, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 2000
Docket97-35725
StatusPublished

This text of 216 F.3d 881 (Donald MacFarlane and James Fogle v. Kay Walter and Kenneth Ducharme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald MacFarlane and James Fogle v. Kay Walter and Kenneth Ducharme, 216 F.3d 881, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5537, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7354, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658 (9th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

216 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2000)

DONALD MACFARLANE and JAMES FOGLE, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
KAY WALTER and KENNETH DUCHARME, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-35725

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Filed July 7, 2000

D.C. No. CV-96-05688-FDB

Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 120 S.CT 1959.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court of the United States, the case is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F.3d 881, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5537, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7354, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-macfarlane-and-james-fogle-v-kay-walter-and-kenneth-ducharme-ca9-2000.