Donald M. Burford v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 28, 2005
Docket13-04-00229-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Donald M. Burford v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Donald M. Burford v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald M. Burford v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-04-229-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

DONALD M. BURFORD, ET AL.,                                                                                Appellants,

                                           v.

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY,

ET AL.,                                                                  Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

                  On appeal from the 117th District Court

                           of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

        Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Castillo and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellants, DONALD M. BURFORD, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 00-05256-B.  After the clerk=s record was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellants state that they no longer wish to prosecute this appeal.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 28th day of July, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Donald M. Burford v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-m-burford-v-hartford-accident-and-indemnity-texapp-2005.