Donald L. Tatum and Dorothy L. Tatum v. Vertis J. Wolrsham and Freda Johnson Michel

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided March 1, 1996·No. 03A01-9507-CH-00219·Published

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON FILED March 1, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk DONALD L. TATUM a nd ) HAM LTON COUNTY I DOROTHY R. TATUM ) 03A01- 9507- CH- 00219 ) Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l e e s ) ) ) HON. HOWELL N. PEOPLES, v. ) CHANCELLOR ) ) VERTI S J . WORSHAM ) ) De f e nda nt , ) Cr os s - De f e nda nt / Appe l l a nt ) ) a nd ) ) FREDA J OHNSON M CHEL I ) ) De f e nda nt , ) Cr os s - Pl a i nt i f f / Appe l l e e ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED

W LLI AM G. SCHW I ALL OF CHATTANOOGA FOR APPELLANT

M CHAEL A. ANDERSON OF CHATTANOOGA FOR DONALD L. TATUM a nd I DOROTHY R. TATUM

W FRANK BROW I I I , OF CHATTANOOGA FOR FREDA J OHNSON M CHEL . N, I

O P I N I O N

Godda r d, P. J .

Thi s c a s e or i gi na t e d f r om a c ompl a i nt by Dona l d L.

Ta t u m a nd Dor ot hy R. Ta t um a ga i ns t Ve r t i s J . W s ha m f or s pe c i f i c or

p e r f o r ma nc e of a l a nd s a l e a gr e e me nt a nd da ma ge s . M . a nd M s . r r Ta t u m a me nde d t he i r c ompl a i nt t o j oi n Fr e da J ohns on M c he l , a i

s e c o n d mor t ga ge hol de r of t he s ubj e c t pr ope r t y. The r e a f t e r , M . s

M c h e l f i l e d a c r os s - c l a i m a ga i ns t M . W s ha m, p r i nc i pa l l y i s or

s e e k i n g a de t e r mi na t i on of t he ba l a nc e owi ng on t he s e c ond

mo r t g a g e whi c h wa s i n di s put e .

M . W s ha m a ppe a l s a j udgme nt of t he Ha mi l t on Count y s or

Ch a n c e r y Cour t gr a nt i ng s pe c i f i c pe r f or ma nc e of a l a nd s a l e

c o n t r a c t a nd da ma ge s r e s ul t i ng f r om t he br e a c h of t ha t c ont r a c t

i n f a v o r of M . a nd M s . Ta t um. r r M . W s ha m a l s o a ppe a l s a s or

d e c r e e de t e r mi ni ng t he ba l a nc e owe d on t he s e c ond mor t ga ge a nd

g r a n t i n g he r a t t or ne y' s f e e s .

The f ol l owi ng i s a s umma r y of t he Cha nc e l l or ' s f i ndi n g s

o f f a c t whi c h a r e a c c ompa ni e d by a pr e s umpt i on of c or r e c t ne s s .

Ru l e 1 3 ( d) of t he Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Appe l l a t e Pr oc e dur e .

M . W s ha m a c qui r e d t he pr ope r t y t ha t i s t he s ubj e c t s or

o f t h i s di s put e f r om Fr e da J ohns on ( now Fr e da M c he l ) i n 1993. i

At t ha t t i me , M . M c he l , who now r e s i de s i n Fl or i da , h e l d a s i

s e c o n d mor t ga ge on t he pr o pe r t y. On Nove mbe r 13, 1993, M . s

W r s h a m e nt e r e d i nt o a Re a l Es t a t e Sa l e s Agr e e me nt wi t h M . a nd o r

M s . Ta t um. r The Agr e e me nt pr ovi de d i n pe r t i ne nt pa r t t he

f o l l o wi ng:

4. Shoul d we wr ongf ul l y f a i l or r e f us e t o c a r r y out t h e t e r ms o f t hi s a gr e e me nt , t he Se l l e r s s ha l l ha ve t he r i ght ( 1) t o e l e c t t o de c l a r e t hi s c ont r a c t c a nc e l l e d, i n whi c h e ve nt t he a mount de pos i t e d ma y be r e t a i ne d by

2 t he m a s l i qui da t e d d a ma ge s , o r ( 2) e l e c t t o a f f i r m t hi s c ont r a c t a nd e nf or c e i t s s pe c i f i c pe r f or ma nc e or r e c ove r d a ma ge s f or i t s br e a c h. I n t hi s c a s e , t he d e pos i t s ha l l be r e t a i ne d t o a ppl y on t he s a l e pr i c e or o n t he da ma ge s r e c ove r e d.

9. Shoul d t hi s of f e r be a c c e pt e d by t he s e l l e r s , t he p a r t i e s he r e t o a gr e e t o c l os e t he pur c ha s e 12- 27- 93.

15. I n e ve nt of t he de f a ul t of e i t he r pa r t y he r e t o, a nd l i t i ga t i on e ns ue s , a r e a s ona bl e a t t or ne y' s f e e s ha l l be i nc l ude d i n t he da ma ge s of t he non- de f a ul t i ng pa r t y, r e c ove r a bl e t oge t he r wi t h a ny c our t c os t s .

Th e c o n t r a c t a l s o pr ovi de d t ha t M . W s ha m woul d ma ke r e pa i r s s or

r e q u i r e d by a n FHA a ppr a i s a l a nd s uppl y a wood i nf e s t a t i on

c l e a r a nc e l e t t e r .

The Ta t ums we r e una bl e t o obt a i n t he ne c e s s a r y

f i n a n c i ng by De c e mbe r 27, 1993. Thus , t he c l os i ng di d not t a k e

p l a c e o n t ha t da t e . But t he pa r t i e s ne got i a t e d f ur t he r a nd a t

l e a s t i mpl i c i t l y a gr e e d t o c l os e t he s a l e on J a nua r y 28, 1994.

Th e Ta t ums a t t e nde d t he c l os i ng on t he pr ope r da t e , a s di d M . s

W r s h a m. o M . W s ha m a s s e r t e d t ha t t he onl y r e a s on s he a t t e nd e d s or

wa s b e c a us e s he wa s t hr e a t e ne d wi t h a l a w s ui t by c ouns e l f or t h e

Ta t ums i f s he f a i l e d t o a t t e nd.

At t he c l os i ng, M . W s ha m r e f us e d t o c l os e t he s a l e s or

b e c a u s e t he r e wa s a di s put e a s t o t he a mount s he owe d on t he

mo r t g a g e he l d by M . M c he l . s i M . M c he l wa s r e s i di ng i n Fl or i d a s i

a n d d i d not a t t e nd t he c l os i ng.

The r e a f t e r , t he Ta t ums br ought t hi s s ui t a ga i ns t M . s

W r s h a m, r e que s t i ng t he Tr i a l Cour t t o or de r s pe c i f i c pe r f or ma n c e o

3 o f t h e i r c ont r a c t . M . W s ha m f i l e d a c r os s - c l a i m a ga i ns t M . s or s

M c h e l s e e ki ng a de t e r mi na t i on of t he a mount owe d on t he mor t ga g e i

h e l d b y M . M c he l . s i M . M c he l c ount e r - c l a i m d. s i e

The Cha nc e l l or f ound t ha t M . W s ha m ha d a c t e d s or

u n r e a s o na bl y by f a i l i ng t o c l os e t he s a l e a nd wa s i n br e a c h of

t h e i r a gr e e me nt . Spe c i f i c a l l y, t he Cha nc e l l or s t a t e d, " t he

a p p r o p r i a t e t hi ng t o do a nd t he pr ope r t hi ng t o do wa s t o go

f o r wa r d wi t h t he c l os i ng a nd e s c r ow a ny di s put e d a mount s o t ha t

a t s o me t i me l a t e r M . W s ha m a nd M . M c he l c a n r e s ol ve s or s i

wh a t e v e r di f f e r e nc e s t he y ha ve e i t he r be t we e n t he m or t hr ough t h e

a pp r o p r i a t e a c t i on. " The Cha nc e l l or gr a nt e d s pe c i f i c pe r f or ma nc e

o f t h e c ont r a c t , a s we l l a s mone t a r y da ma ge s , i n f a vor of t he

Ta t u ms a nd or de r e d t ha t a c l os i ng t a ke pl a c e on J ul y 12, 1994.

Th e Ch a nc e l l or a l s o d i r e c t e d t ha t a de t e r mi na t i on be ma de a s t o

t h e v a l ue of M . M c he l ' s mor t ga ge a nd a wa r de d a t t or ne y' s f e e s t o s i

M . M c he l . s i As t o t he di s put e d por t i on of t he de bt , t he

Ch a n c e l l or or de r e d t ha t t he y be pl a c e d i n e s c r ow unt i l t he Cou r t

ma d e a de t e r mi na t i on of t he a mount owe d.

M . W s ha m r a i s e s s e ve n i s s ue s on a ppe a l , f our a s t o s or

M . a n d M s . Ta t um a nd t hr e e a s t o M . M c he l . r r s i W wi l l a ddr e s s e

e a c h i n t ur n.

M . W s ha m f i r s t a r gue s t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d i n s or

f a i l i n g t o f i nd t ha t t he Ta t um' s ha d br e a c he d t he l a nd s a l e s

c o n t r a c t by be i ng una bl e t o c l os e t he c ont r a c t on De c e mbe r 27,

4 1 9 9 3 , o r , a l t e r na t i ve l y, t ha t t he c ont r a c t ha d e xpi r e d on t ha t

da t e . Es s e nt i a l l y, M . W s ha m i s a r gui ng t ha t t i me wa s of t he s or

e s s e n c e of t he c ont r a c t , a nd by f a i l i ng t o be a bl e t o c l os e on

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald L. Tatum and Dorothy L. Tatum v. Vertis J. Wolrsham and Freda Johnson Michel, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Donald L. Tatum and Dorothy L. Tatum v. Vertis J. Wolrsham and Freda Johnson Michel (Donald L. Tatum and Dorothy L. Tatum v. Vertis J. Wolrsham and Freda Johnson Michel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GRW Enterprises, Inc. v. Davis
797 S.W.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1990)
Bush v. Cathey
598 S.W.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1979)
Lewellen v. Lewellen
5 S.W.2d 4 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)