Donald Keith Lucas v. Kimberly Kay Hessong
This text of Donald Keith Lucas v. Kimberly Kay Hessong (Donald Keith Lucas v. Kimberly Kay Hessong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 7, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00527-CV
DONALD KEITH LUCAS, Appellant
V.
KIMBERLY KAY HESSONG, Appellee
On Appeal from the 387th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 83,625
O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed on April 9, 2002. A motion for new trial and notice of appeal were filed on May 8, 2002.
On September 5, 2002, this Court sent appellant a notice informing him that the district clerk had advised this Court that the reason the clerk's record had not been filed was because appellant had not paid for it. The notice also informed appellant that this Court might dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution unless within 15 days of the date of the notice he made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this Court with proof of payment. The 15 days have expired and appellant has not responded to this Court's September 5 notice.
Accordingly, appellant's appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Radack.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald Keith Lucas v. Kimberly Kay Hessong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-keith-lucas-v-kimberly-kay-hessong-texapp-2002.