Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden
Opinion
Schnepp, a Nevada prisoner, has been here before on habeas corpus on an appeal from the District of Nevada. Schnepp v. Hocker, 429 F.2d 1096. See also Schnepp v. State, 82 Nev. 257, 415 P.2d 619; Schnepp v. Fogliam, 83 Nev. 131, 425 P.2d 141; and Schnepp v. State, 84 Nev. 120, 437 P.2d 84.
This time he asserts there is an unconstitutional presumption against him in Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.065. The short and complete answer is the Nevada trial court did not use the presumption in its instructions.
The district court order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
439 F.2d 712 (Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.