Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden
This text of 439 F.2d 712 (Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Schnepp, a Nevada prisoner, has been here before on habeas corpus on an appeal from the District of Nevada. Schnepp v. Hocker, 429 F.2d 1096. See also Schnepp v. State, 82 Nev. 257, 415 P.2d 619; Schnepp v. Fogliam, 83 Nev. 131, 425 P.2d 141; and Schnepp v. State, 84 Nev. 120, 437 P.2d 84.
This time he asserts there is an unconstitutional presumption against him in Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.065. The short and complete answer is the Nevada trial court did not use the presumption in its instructions.
The district court order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 712, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-j-schnepp-v-carl-g-hocker-warden-ca9-1971.