Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden

439 F.2d 712, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11735
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 22, 1971·No. 26471_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Schnepp, a Nevada prisoner, has been here before on habeas corpus on an appeal from the District of Nevada. Schnepp v. Hocker, 429 F.2d 1096. See also Schnepp v. State, 82 Nev. 257, 415 P.2d 619; Schnepp v. Fogliam, 83 Nev. 131, 425 P.2d 141; and Schnepp v. State, 84 Nev. 120, 437 P.2d 84.

This time he asserts there is an unconstitutional presumption against him in Nevada Revised Statutes § 205.065. The short and complete answer is the Nevada trial court did not use the presumption in its instructions.

The district court order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden, 439 F.2d 712, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11735 (9th Cir. 1971).

439 F.2d 712 (Donald J. Schnepp v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schnepp v. State
415 P.2d 619 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1966)
Schnepp v. Fogliani
425 P.2d 141 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)
Schnepp v. State
437 P.2d 84 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1968)