Donald Herbert Parker v. United States

262 F.2d 957, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4545
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 1959
Docket6029_1
StatusPublished

This text of 262 F.2d 957 (Donald Herbert Parker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Herbert Parker v. United States, 262 F.2d 957, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4545 (10th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Separate informations were filed against Donald Herbert Parker and Russell Leo Bradley. The informations were identical except in respect to the name of the accused. Each information charged *958 that the defendant transported in interstate commerce from Hamilton, Ohio, to Nowata, Oklahoma, a described stolen automobile, knowing that it had been stolen. Each defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment. Later each defendant filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate the judgment and sentence. A hearing was had upon the motions; they were severally denied; and separate appeals were perfected.

The denial of the motion in the Bradley case was recently affirmed. Bradley v. United States, 10 Cir., 262 F.2d 679. And since the procedure in the two cases was substantially identical if not completely so, upon the authority of that case, the order in this case denying the motion to vacate the judgment and sentence is

Affirmed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell Leo Bradley v. United States
262 F.2d 679 (Tenth Circuit, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 F.2d 957, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-herbert-parker-v-united-states-ca10-1959.