Donald Herbert Parker v. United States
This text of 262 F.2d 957 (Donald Herbert Parker v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Separate informations were filed against Donald Herbert Parker and Russell Leo Bradley. The informations were identical except in respect to the name of the accused. Each information charged *958 that the defendant transported in interstate commerce from Hamilton, Ohio, to Nowata, Oklahoma, a described stolen automobile, knowing that it had been stolen. Each defendant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment. Later each defendant filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate the judgment and sentence. A hearing was had upon the motions; they were severally denied; and separate appeals were perfected.
The denial of the motion in the Bradley case was recently affirmed. Bradley v. United States, 10 Cir., 262 F.2d 679. And since the procedure in the two cases was substantially identical if not completely so, upon the authority of that case, the order in this case denying the motion to vacate the judgment and sentence is
Affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 F.2d 957, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-herbert-parker-v-united-states-ca10-1959.