Donald H. Jacobs, Doing Business as the Jacobs Instrument Company v. United States

252 F.2d 296, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3697
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 1958
Docket7562
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 F.2d 296 (Donald H. Jacobs, Doing Business as the Jacobs Instrument Company v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald H. Jacobs, Doing Business as the Jacobs Instrument Company v. United States, 252 F.2d 296, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3697 (4th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing without prejudice a motion in the District Court to reopen the case of Jacobs v. United States, 4 Cir., 239 F.2d 459, certiorari denied 353 U.S. 904, 77 S.Ct. 666, 1 L.Ed.2d 666, in which judgment had been affirmed by this court. The purpose of the motion was to have the liability of the United States for certain use and sales taxes, asserted against Jacobs by the State of Maryland, adjudicated in the case. The District Judge dismissed the motion without prejudice, but stated in the order of dismissal that he would consider a further motion upon the final termination of an action which Jacobs had instituted in a court of the State of Maryland with regard to the use and sales taxes.

It is clear that the order appealed from should be affirmed, as the District Judge was acting well within the limits of a sound discretion in dismissing without prejudice the motion to reopen the case, but with leave to renew it after the termination of the action in the state court. As final judgment herein has been affirmed on appeal, there is question as to whether, if the motion should be renewed in accordance with the permission granted, it could be passed upon by the District Court without leave from this Court. See Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, 4 Cir., 243 F.2d 163, 164. To avoid unnecessary delay, therefore, we will grant leave, in the order affirming the dismissal, for the District *297 Court, after the termination of the action instituted by Jacobs in the state court, to consider and pass upon any motion which he may present to reopen this case for the purpose of having adjudicated the liability of the United States for the use and sales taxes in controversy.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jacobs
298 F.2d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. Jacobs
187 F. Supp. 630 (D. Maryland, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 F.2d 296, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-h-jacobs-doing-business-as-the-jacobs-instrument-company-v-united-ca4-1958.