Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00219-CV
DONALD GILLETTE APPELLANT
V.
JOHN SMITH AND EUNICE SMITH APPELLEES
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On September 18, 2013, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We further notified appellant that, in accordance with Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(b), (c), this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless
appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court on or
before September 30, 2013, a response reasonably explaining the failure to
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. timely file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any
response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: October 17, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith (Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.