Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 17, 2013·No. 02-13-00219-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00219-CV

DONALD GILLETTE APPELLANT

V.

JOHN SMITH AND EUNICE SMITH APPELLEES

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On September 18, 2013, we notified appellant that his brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We further notified appellant that, in accordance with Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b), (c), this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court on or

before September 30, 2013, a response reasonably explaining the failure to

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. timely file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any

response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: October 17, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith (Donald Gillette v. John Smith and Eunice Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.