Donald Gene Henthorn v. Richard Thornburgh

946 F.2d 1564, 292 U.S. App. D.C. 84, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30983, 1991 WL 193528

• Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
• Decided: September 30, 1991
• Docket: 90-5316
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

946 F.2d 1564

292 U.S.App.D.C. 84

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Donald Gene HENTHORN, Appellant,
v.
Richard THORNBURGH, et al.

No. 90-5316.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 30, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, C.A. No. 90-02184; Revercomb, J.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court filed on September 19, 1990 dismissing the complaint be affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.