Donald Gene Henthorn v. J. T. Hadden, Warden

Fourth Circuit

Donald Gene Henthorn v. J. T. Hadden, Warden

37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34826

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 17, 1994

Docket18-1932

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1493 (Donald Gene Henthorn v. J. T. Hadden, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donald Gene Henthorn v. J. T. Hadden, Warden, 37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34826 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1493
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Donald Gene HENTHORN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
J. T. HADDEN, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6779.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-93-564)

Donald Gene Henthorn, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henthorn v. Hadden, No. CA-93-564 (E.D.N.C. June 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1493
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Donald Gene HENTHORN, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
J. T. HADDEN, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6779.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-93-564)

Donald Gene Henthorn, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henthorn v. Hadden, No. CA-93-564 (E.D.N.C. June 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1493, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-gene-henthorn-v-j-t-hadden-warden-ca4-1994.