Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Manfred MAASS, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant
84 F.3d 1212, 96 Daily Journal DAR 6419, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3925, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13203, 1996 WL 291747
Opinion
Manfred Maass (“the state”) appeals an order granting Donald Sager a writ of habe-as corpus. The district court held that Sager had been denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons given by the district court in its published memorandum, Sager v. Maass, 907 F.Supp. 1412 (D.Or.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Manfred MAASS, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant, 84 F.3d 1212, 96 Daily Journal DAR 6419, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3925, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13203, 1996 WL 291747 (9th Cir. 1996).
84 F.3d 1212 (Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Manfred MAASS, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sager v. Maass
907 F. Supp. 1412 (D. Oregon, 1995)