Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Manfred MAASS, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant
This text of 84 F.3d 1212 (Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Manfred MAASS, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Manfred Maass (“the state”) appeals an order granting Donald Sager a writ of habe-as corpus. The district court held that Sager had been denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons given by the district court in its published memorandum, Sager v. Maass, 907 F.Supp. 1412 (D.Or.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F.3d 1212, 96 Daily Journal DAR 6419, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3925, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13203, 1996 WL 291747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-g-sager-petitioner-appellee-v-manfred-maass-warden-oregon-state-ca9-1996.