Donald G. Lyon v. The Boeing Company

566 F.2d 676, 200 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 19, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5476
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1977
Docket76-1146
StatusPublished

This text of 566 F.2d 676 (Donald G. Lyon v. The Boeing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald G. Lyon v. The Boeing Company, 566 F.2d 676, 200 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 19, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5476 (9th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This matter is here on the appeal of Donald G. Lyon from a summary judgment against him in his patent infringement suit against The Boeing Company.

The district court concluded that the record manifested that the wing and flap system on the 747 model aircraft constructed by Boeing did not infringe claim 10 of Lyon’s U.S. Patent No. 3,127,130; that the leading edge flap on said aircraft did not infringe claims 1, 2, 3 and 6 of Lyon’s U.S. Patent No. 3,076,623; and, in addition, that each of said patent claims was invalid because anticipated (35 U.S.C. § 102(b)) and obvious (35 U.S.C. § 103).

Our examination of the record impels us to the same conclusions as those of the court below. Having also studied Judge Sharp’s written opinion, reported in 438 F.Supp. 345 (W.D.Wash. 1975), and being satisfied that it sets out a full and correct exposition of the matter, we confirm and adopt it in all respects as the opinion of this court.

Accordingly, the judgment should be and is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyon v. Boeing Co.
438 F. Supp. 345 (W.D. Washington, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 F.2d 676, 200 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 19, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 5476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-g-lyon-v-the-boeing-company-ca9-1977.