Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas
This text of 448 F.2d 652 (Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).
. The contentions presented by the appellant in his habeas petition are: (1) he is entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent while on parole; and (2) he is not required to exhaust state remedies prior to filing a Federal habeas petition because Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional, and therefore an inadequate and ineffective State remedy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F.2d 652, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-eugene-taylor-v-state-of-texas-ca5-1971.