Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas

448 F.2d 652, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8004
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 1971
Docket71-2056_1
StatusPublished

This text of 448 F.2d 652 (Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas, 448 F.2d 652, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8004 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

2

. The contentions presented by the appellant in his habeas petition are: (1) he is entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent while on parole; and (2) he is not required to exhaust state remedies prior to filing a Federal habeas petition because Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional, and therefore an inadequate and ineffective State remedy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 F.2d 652, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-eugene-taylor-v-state-of-texas-ca5-1971.