Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas

448 F.2d 652, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8004
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 17, 1971·No. 71-2056_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 , 2

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

2

. The contentions presented by the appellant in his habeas petition are: (1) he is entitled to credit on his sentence for time spent while on parole; and (2) he is not required to exhaust state remedies prior to filing a Federal habeas petition because Art. 11.07, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional, and therefore an inadequate and ineffective State remedy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas, 448 F.2d 652, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8004 (5th Cir. 1971).

448 F.2d 652 (Donald Eugene Taylor v. State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related