Donald E. Purdy v. Department of the Air Force
This text of 38 F.3d 1222 (Donald E. Purdy v. Department of the Air Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
38 F.3d 1222
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Donald E. PURDY, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent.
No. 93-3451.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1993.
ORDER
Upon consideration of Donald E. Purdy's motion for reconsideration of this court's November 3, 1993 order dismissing his petition for review for failure to file a brief and his motion for an extension of time to file his brief,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Purdy's motion for reconsideration is granted. The November 3, 1993 order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the case is reinstated.
(2) Purdy's motion for an extension of time is granted.
(3) The Department of the Air Force should compute the brief due date from the date of filing of this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 F.3d 1222, 1993 WL 523484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-e-purdy-v-department-of-the-air-force-cafc-1993.