Donald E. Muir, H. Jeff Buttram, and O. Navarro Faircloth v. Alabama Educational Television Commission Jacob Walker, Etc., Gertrude Barnstone and Harvey Malyn v. The University of Houston, Kuht-Tv
This text of 662 F.2d 1110 (Donald E. Muir, H. Jeff Buttram, and O. Navarro Faircloth v. Alabama Educational Television Commission Jacob Walker, Etc., Gertrude Barnstone and Harvey Malyn v. The University of Houston, Kuht-Tv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Donald E. MUIR, H. Jeff Buttram, and O. Navarro Faircloth,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ALABAMA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION COMMISSION; Jacob Walker,
etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Gertrude BARNSTONE and Harvey Malyn, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, KUHT-TV, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 80-7546, 81-2011.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.*
Nov. 16, 1981.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 514 F.Supp. 670; Gabrielle K. McDonald, Judge.
Edward Still, Birmingham, Ala., Neil Bradley, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Leitman, Siegal & Payne, P.A., Eddie Leitman, Andrew P. Campbell, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees.
Theodore D. Frank, Washington, D.C., for Public Broadcasting Service, amicus.
Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Pat Bailey, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants.
Marjorie S. Reed, Daniel M. Armstrong, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Linda Oliver, FCC, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae FCC.
David H. Berg & Associates, Philip Zelikow, David Berg, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion September 21, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981 656 F.2d 1012).
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 30, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981 660 F.2d 137).
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge,** BROWN, AINSWORTH, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, JR., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that these causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs,IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these causes be consolidated for rehearing and disposition by the Court en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
662 F.2d 1110, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-e-muir-h-jeff-buttram-and-o-navarro-faircloth-v-alabama-ca5-1981.