Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 10, 2021
Docket04-20-00055-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan (Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00055-CV

Donald E. GHIDONI, Appellant

v.

STONE OAK INC., Hill Country Water Works Company, Hill Country S.A., Ltd., and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan, Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1992-CI-17421 Honorable Antonio Arteaga, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2021

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant seeks to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment.

This court has jurisdiction to review the denial of a summary judgment motion only when the

parties file competing motions for summary judgment, and the trial court grants one motion but

denies the other. Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett, 164 S.W.3d 656, 661 (Tex. 2006). The record

shows that competing motions for summary judgment were not filed in the trial court. Therefore,

this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. See Humphreys v. Caldwell, 888 S.W.2d 469, 470

(Tex. 1994) (holding denial of summary judgment is not appealable); see also Lehmann v. Har 04-20-00055-CV

Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (absent an appealable interlocutory order or final

judgment in writing, appellate court has no jurisdiction). We therefore issued an order instructing

appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appellant responded but did not establish that this court has jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss

this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett
164 S.W.3d 656 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)
Humphreys v. Caldwell
888 S.W.2d 469 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-e-ghidoni-v-stone-oak-inc-hill-country-water-works-company-and-texapp-2021.