Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Fourth Circuit

Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution

448 F.2d 786

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1971

Docket13291

StatusPublished

This text of 448 F.2d 786 (Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 448 F.2d 786 (4th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, §§ 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, §§ 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 F.2d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-doxzen-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-ca4-1971.