Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Fourth Circuit

Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution

448 F.2d 786

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 1971·No. 13291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, §§ 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, §§ 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 448 F.2d 786 (4th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

448 F.2d 786 (Donald Doxzen v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.