Donald Dolan v. R. W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary, and the State of Ohio

Sixth Circuit

Donald Dolan v. R. W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary, and the State of Ohio

180 F.2d 171

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 3, 1950·No. 10951_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been duly considered upon the record and upon the respective briefs of the appellant and the appellees;

And it appearing that appellant has not sufficiently indicated that he has exhausted the remedies available to him in the courts of Ohio, as required by section 2254, Title 28, of the United States Code Annotated.

The order of the United States District Court denying the application of appellant for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been duly considered upon the record and upon the respective briefs of the appellant and the appellees;

And it appearing that appellant has not sufficiently indicated that he has exhausted the remedies available to him in the courts of Ohio, as required by section 2254, Title 28, of the United States Code Annotated.

The order of the United States District Court denying the application of appellant for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Donald Dolan v. R. W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary, and the State of Ohio, 180 F.2d 171 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

180 F.2d 171 (Donald Dolan v. R. W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary, and the State of Ohio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.