Donald Co. v. Dubinsky

219 P. 209, 74 Colo. 128
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedOctober 1, 1923
DocketNo. 10,726
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 219 P. 209 (Donald Co. v. Dubinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Co. v. Dubinsky, 219 P. 209, 74 Colo. 128 (Colo. 1923).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error brought suit against defendant in error for damages for deceit, and garnished a bank by attachment. On joint motion of the defendant and the garnishee the court discharged the garnishee. The plaintiff brings error and moves for supersedeas.

The discharge of the garnishee was right because the action was in tort and the statute permits attachment only in aid of actions upon contract. Code 1921, § 97.

Supersedeas denied and judgment affirmed.

Mr.'Chief Justice Teller and Mr. Justice Sheafor concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G.S. v. Ewing
1990 OK 1 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)
Crist v. United Underwriters, Ltd.
230 F. Supp. 136 (D. Colorado, 1964)
Walker v. Leach
158 F.2d 15 (Tenth Circuit, 1946)
Black v. Plumb
29 P.2d 708 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1934)
Thuringer v. Bonner
222 P. 1118 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 P. 209, 74 Colo. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-co-v-dubinsky-colo-1923.