Donald C. Wilson v. United States

Third Circuit

Donald C. Wilson v. United States

426 F.2d 246, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9242

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 1970

Docket18215_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 426 F.2d 246 (Donald C. Wilson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donald C. Wilson v. United States, 426 F.2d 246, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9242 (3d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges of violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a) (1964), which forbids purchasing, selling, dispensing or distributing heroin not in or from the original tax-stamped packages, and of 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (1964), which forbids selling, bartering, exchanging or *247 giving heroin except pursuant to a written order on a form issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. He was sentenced on October 24, 1967.

Thereafter, petitioner filed a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1964), to vacate those sentences because they were imposed under unconstitutional statutes. He relied on the fact that there was no means whereby to obtain either the required tax stamp, § 4704(a), or the required order form, § 4705(a). In the district court he contended that the statutes violated his privilege against self-incrimination. The district court denied relief and this appeal followed. In this court he has added the contention that the statutes are not truly revenue measures and, hence, are unconstitutional.

We have considered and reject both contentions. The controlling cases are Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970); Minor v. United States, 396 U.S. 87, 90 S.Ct. 284, 24 L.Ed.2d 283 (1969); and United States v. Clark, 425 F.2d 827 (3 Cir., 1970). The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges of violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a) (1964), which forbids purchasing, selling, dispensing or distributing heroin not in or from the original tax-stamped packages, and of 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (1964), which forbids selling, bartering, exchanging or *247 giving heroin except pursuant to a written order on a form issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. He was sentenced on October 24, 1967.

Thereafter, petitioner filed a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1964), to vacate those sentences because they were imposed under unconstitutional statutes. He relied on the fact that there was no means whereby to obtain either the required tax stamp, § 4704(a), or the required order form, § 4705(a). In the district court he contended that the statutes violated his privilege against self-incrimination. The district court denied relief and this appeal followed. In this court he has added the contention that the statutes are not truly revenue measures and, hence, are unconstitutional.

We have considered and reject both contentions. The controlling cases are Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970); Minor v. United States, 396 U.S. 87, 90 S.Ct. 284, 24 L.Ed.2d 283 (1969); and United States v. Clark, 425 F.2d 827 (3 Cir., 1970). The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 F.2d 246, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-c-wilson-v-united-states-ca3-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack