Donald Alves v. Superintendent of Buildings
Opinion
One reason these appeals by the respondent and the [829]*829interveners cannot succeed is that they were not claimed within twenty days of the entry of an order “decisive of the case” (G. L. c. 231, § 96),nor within twenty days of an “order decisive of the issues rendered... by the superior court” (G. L. c. 213, § ID, as amended), nor within twenty days of the time when, on a proper construction of the provisions of Rule 79 of the Superior Court (1954), the case went to “final judgment” (G. L. c. 213, § ID).
Appeals dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
296 N.E.2d 830 (Donald Alves v. Superintendent of Buildings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.