Donald Alves v. Superintendent of Buildings

296 N.E.2d 830, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 828, 1973 Mass. App. LEXIS 570
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided June 7, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

One reason these appeals by the respondent and the [829]*829interveners cannot succeed is that they were not claimed within twenty days of the entry of an order “decisive of the case” (G. L. c. 231, § 96),nor within twenty days of an “order decisive of the issues rendered... by the superior court” (G. L. c. 213, § ID, as amended), nor within twenty days of the time when, on a proper construction of the provisions of Rule 79 of the Superior Court (1954), the case went to “final judgment” (G. L. c. 213, § ID).

Benjamin M. Gottlieb (Ronald J. Lowenstein with him) for the interveners Alden Corrugated Container Corporation & another; Roy D. Santos, Assistant City Solicitor, for the respondent Superintendent of Buildings of New Bedford, also with him. John D. Sheehan for the petitioner.

Appeals dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Alves v. Superintendent of Buildings, 296 N.E.2d 830, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 828, 1973 Mass. App. LEXIS 570 (Mass. Ct. App. 1973).

296 N.E.2d 830 (Donald Alves v. Superintendent of Buildings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooney v. Commissioner of the Real Property Department
312 N.E.2d 584 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)