Donald A. Diaz v. United States
391 F.2d 932, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7479
Opinion
The extensive and carefully considered opinion of the District Court, rendered pursuant to an evidentiary hearing, denying relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, has *933 been published, 264 F.Supp. 937 (1967). The factual findings cannot be branded as clearly erroneous. We are in substantial agreement with the legal conclusions expounded. We, therefore, perceive nothing to be gained by super-imposing another opinion upon that which has already been written.
The Judgment appealed from is Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donald A. Diaz v. United States, 391 F.2d 932, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7479 (5th Cir. 1968).
391 F.2d 932 (Donald A. Diaz v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. White v. Mohn
283 S.E.2d 914 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1981)
United States v. Keller
451 F. Supp. 631 (D. Puerto Rico, 1978)
Blake v. United States
372 F. Supp. 186 (M.D. Florida, 1973)
United States Ex Rel. Herhal v. Anderson
334 F. Supp. 733 (D. Delaware, 1971)
United States v. Charles Lee Richardson
422 F.2d 847 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
State v. Garcia
450 P.2d 621 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1969)