Donahue v. Stratton

85 So. 2d 735, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4269
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 2d 735 (Donahue v. Stratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donahue v. Stratton, 85 So. 2d 735, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4269 (Fla. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm the judg[736]*736ment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that the only substantial questions presented on this appeal were answered adversely to appellant’s contention in the case of Hill v. Morris, Fla., 85 So.2d 847, and it, therefore, appearing to the court that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, €. J., and HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., and PRUNTY, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Morris
85 So. 2d 847 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 2d 735, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 4269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donahue-v-stratton-fla-1956.