Donahue v. State
362 S.W.3d 70, 2012 WL 1034183, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 425
Opinion
ORDER
Abelee Donahue appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Donahue claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial attorney failed to call an expert witness at trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donahue v. State, 362 S.W.3d 70, 2012 WL 1034183, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
362 S.W.3d 70 (Donahue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Noble v. Noble
362 S.W.3d 70 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)