Donahue v. State
This text of 353 S.W.3d 476 (Donahue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Myson Donahue appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Donahue contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to an improper statement in the State’s closing argument, and his appellate counsel failed to raise a claim of plain error on direct appeal. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 S.W.3d 476, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1619, 2011 WL 6258464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donahue-v-state-moctapp-2011.